CodeMouse vs Sourcery

Both offer AI-assisted code reviews. They differ in language coverage, pricing model, and whether you bring your own AI provider.

	CodeMouse	Sourcery
AI model	Claude + GPT (either or both)	Custom / GPT
Pricing	$10/mo flat	From $30/seat/mo
Per-seat pricing	No — one flat price, unlimited team	Yes — pay per developer
Bring your own key	Yes — Anthropic and/or OpenAI	No — bundled
AI cost markup	None — pay Anthropic/OpenAI direct	Bundled into the per-seat price
Languages	All — TypeScript, Python, Go, Rust, Java, etc.	Python-focused
Repo context	Full repository	Diff-focused
Reads existing PR comments	Yes — skips what humans/other bots said	No
Setup time	2 minutes	10+ minutes

When to pick CodeMouse over Sourcery

• Your stack isn't only Python. Sourcery is Python-first. CodeMouse reviews any language Claude or GPT understands — TypeScript, Go, Rust, Java, anything.
• Your team is more than two people. Sourcery is $30+/seat. CodeMouse is $10/mo total for the whole team.
• You want full-repo context. Claude and/or GPT see your entire codebase when reviewing, not just the diff.
• You want transparent AI costs. BYO Anthropic/OpenAI key — you see the actual provider bill, ~$0.05–0.15 per review per provider.

When Sourcery might be a better fit

• You're a Python shop wanting an opinionated Python-specific reviewer.
• You prefer not to manage API keys at all.

Ready to try CodeMouse? Sign up with GitHub — 14-day free trial, no credit card. Or see the broader three-way comparison.